Response to Oenotria part 2
Y’know how every week we tell people, “don’t forget, instead of bringing a bottle you can always bring a $10 donation so that the Winos actually have some money to keep things running, ” and no one ever does? Of course, the one week that I bring $10 instead of wine (first time ever), four other people decide to do it too — and this is in a meeting of eight. Faced with the prospect of only tasting three bottles and leaving thirsty, we gave Joe $40 of the $50 we earned and sent him out to buy more. Here’s what we ended up with:
Tenura delle Terre Nere (rosé)
Vintage: 2006
Price: $15
Pigmentation: a really unique pink/amber look on this one, rust near the edges, looked almost like a beer
Nose: red berry notes, particularly cherry and strawberry, some cranberry, some syrupy almost Jolly Rancher character to it
Palette: tons of acidity immediately apparent on the back end, a strong orange juice component, lemon juice… but for all the acidity, it had a really pronounced medium or almost full body, with a creamy/syrupy texture
Consensus: mixed response, with many finding the acidity too much to handle. Jesse enjoyed, as did Andrew, who called it the best rosé he’s had.
Andrew: Yeah, I’d buy it if I had to buy a rosé. But I don’t.
Jordan: What about, y’know, hot days, or the beach…
Andrew: Ok, hot days? First of all, I don’t go to the beach. And picnics? Who the fuck picnics?
Fattoria Nicodemi, Montepulciano d’Abruzzo
Vintage: 2006
Price: $18
Nose: initial notes of sweat and dirty socks were universally reviled, but that funk shook off with a little swirling, revealing earthy blueberry notes
Palette: smoke, some nice acidity, powdery tannins, and nice ripe plum. No finish to speak of, but the palette itself was well-received.
Consensus: Nick didn’t mind the lack of a finish because he was impressed enough with the mouthfeel; others would’ve bought again if only there was more going on in the back end.
Ruffino Il Docale, Toscana
Vintage: 2003
Price: $15
Nose: fruit all around. Jesse got horse/stable characteristics. Jordan insisted on sandalwood. Noah got grass, and Jason got big floral.
Palette: that classic Italian “light body with high tannin” combo was there, which many found off-putting. Decent fruit: cranberry, currants, unripe cherry. Bittersweet dark chocolate.
Consensus: the bottle promised “a lush, modern, fruit-driven style,” but there was nothing lush about this one. Jason acknowledged that it wasn’t unpleasant, “but I can buy the Protocolo for six bucks.
Villa Antonori, Toscana
Vintage: 2003
Price: $20
Varietals: 60% Sangiovese, 20% Cab, 15% Merlot, 5% Syrah
Nose: nice big fruit, dark cherries, chocolate, mint, cinnamon. Jesse pulled some cantaloupe out of there and Noah got on board.
Palette: decent fruit, but no sense of balance at first. Mellows out eventually to hint at the notes in the opulent nose.
Consensus: Jason was “confused” by this wine… good fruit on the front, then crazy flavors all over the place, before it eventually calmed down. Overall pass.


I’m with Nick on the Montepulciano d’Abruzzo - fantastic well-balanced palate with subtlety and deliciousness - the lack of finish didn’t really bother me at all.
And that was the best Rose I’ve ever had - you failed to note the significant hotness (high alcohol) both in the nose and mouth-feel - I didn’t know they made Roses at 14% BAC, but while that may turn your picnic crowd off, it didn’t bother me at all.
Comment by Andrew Lang — March 13, 2008 @ 2:23 am
[...] March 13, 2008 [...]
Pingback by Young Winos of LA » Response to white Burgundy — March 28, 2008 @ 3:02 am